Michigan No-Fault Law, section by section › MCL 500.3157a
Provision of treatment, products, services, or accommodations under personal protection insurance; submission of records for utilization review; false or misleading information is a fraudulent insurance act; rules; appeal of determination.
In plain terms
Providers who treat no-fault patients after July 1, 2020 are deemed to agree to submit records for utilization review under DIFS rules and to comply with DIFS decisions. Knowingly submitting false records is a fraudulent insurance act, and a provider may appeal an insurer's overutilization determination to the department.
How this section works in practice
Utilization review is the reform's second cost control. Any provider that treats a no-fault patient after July 1, 2020 is deemed to have agreed to submit records for review under rules issued by the Department of Insurance and Financial Services and to comply with the department's decisions. When treatment is longer, more frequent or otherwise outside what the diagnosis usually requires, the insurer or the catastrophic claims association may demand a written explanation of medical necessity, and a provider found to have overutilized may appeal to the department. Knowingly submitting false or misleading records is a fraudulent insurance act. For patients the section is mostly invisible, but a utilization-review request is often the first sign that an insurer is building a case to stop a course of treatment, and treating providers should answer it in full and on time.
Text of MCL 500.3157a
Sec. 3157a.
(1) By rendering any treatment, products, services, or accommodations to 1 or more injured persons for an accidental bodily injury covered by personal protection insurance under this chapter after July 1, 2020, a physician, hospital, clinic, or other person is considered to have agreed to do both of the following:
(a) Submit necessary records and other information concerning treatment, products, services, or accommodations provided for utilization review under this section.
(b) Comply with any decision of the department under this section.
(2) A physician, hospital, clinic, or other person or institution that knowingly submits under this section false or misleading records or other information to an insurer, the association created under section 3104, or the department commits a fraudulent insurance act under section 4503.
(3) The department shall promulgate rules under the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.201 to 24.328, to do both of the following:
(a) Establish criteria or standards for utilization review that identify utilization of treatment, products, services, or accommodations under this chapter above the usual range of utilization for the treatment, products, services, or accommodations based on medically accepted standards.
(b) Provide procedures related to utilization review, including procedures for all of the following:
(i) Acquiring necessary records, medical bills, and other information concerning the treatment, products, services, or accommodations provided.
(ii) Allowing an insurer to request an explanation for and requiring a physician, hospital, clinic, or other person to explain the necessity or indication for treatment, products, services, or accommodations provided.
(iii) Appealing determinations.
(4) If a physician, hospital, clinic, or other person provides treatment, products, services, or accommodations under this chapter that are not usually associated with, are longer in duration than, are more frequent than, or extend over a greater number of days than the treatment, products, services, or accommodations usually require for the diagnosis or condition for which the patient is being treated, the insurer or the association created under section 3104 may require the physician, hospital, clinic, or other person to explain the necessity or indication for the treatment, products, services, or accommodations in writing under the procedures provided under subsection (3).
(5) If an insurer or the association created under section 3104 determines that a physician, hospital, clinic, or other person overutilized or otherwise rendered or ordered inappropriate treatment, products, services, or accommodations, or that the cost of the treatment, products, services, or accommodations was inappropriate under this chapter, the physician, hospital, clinic, or other person may appeal the determination to the department under the procedures provided under subsection (3).
(6) As used in this section, "utilization review" means the initial evaluation by an insurer or the association created under section 3104 of the appropriateness in terms of both the level and the quality of treatment, products, services, or accommodations provided under this chapter based on medically accepted standards.
History: Add. 2019, Act 21, Imd. Eff. June 11, 2019
Source: MCL 500.3157a at legislature.mi.gov (official text). Text as published in the 2025 Michigan Compiled Laws; reviewed by Koussan Law on September 15, 2026.
Sections this one refers to
- MCL 500.3104: The Michigan Catastrophic Claims Association
Sections that refer to this one
- MCL 500.3157b: Utilization Review Confidentiality
Practice pages
Important: This is not legal advice
This article is general information about Michigan personal injury law. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for consultation with a licensed Michigan attorney about your specific situation. The laws, deadlines, procedures, and frameworks here are general guidelines that may or may not apply to your case.
Every personal injury case turns on its own unique facts. The timing, the parties, the evidence, the jurisdiction, the insurance available, and dozens of other variables can change the legal analysis. Do not rely on anything written on this website to make decisions about your case.
If you have been injured in Michigan, the only responsible step is to speak with a licensed Michigan attorney about your specific facts. Call Koussan Law at (313) 800-0000 for a free consultation, or contact a different Michigan personal injury attorney of your choosing.
Reading this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with Koussan Law. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.



